Climate Change in Macedonia

Climate data for Macedonia using open data. Emissions, trends, and what’s actually changed.

What is this page?

This dashboard shows climate emissions data for Macedonia using open sources. It tracks total economy-wide emissions and how different gases contribute over time. We exclude land-use and forestry data to keep the numbers consistent and comparable year to year.

What is this page?

This dashboard shows climate emissions data for Macedonia using open sources. It tracks total economy-wide emissions and how different gases contribute over time. We exclude land-use and forestry data to keep the numbers consistent and comparable year to year.

1990–2022 Total excluding LULUCF CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O / F-gases
Latest total MtCO₂e

Total emissions in 2022 (excluding land & forestry).

Change since 1990 %

Long-term trend compared to 1990.

Gas driver share

Main contributor to emissions.

Emissions dashboard

Data source: Climate Watch (WRI). Units: MtCO₂e. Scope: Total excluding LULUCF.

Total emissions over time

Gas composition (latest year)

Decade change

Method

Filter: MKD · Series: Total excluding LULUCF. Land-use / forestry rows are excluded.

Units: MtCO₂e. Values are visualized as provided (no rescaling).

Notes adapt to the selected year range; charts update from the same filtered series.

Attribution

Data: Climate Watch (WRI). Visuals + interpretation: Диши.мк.

Climate Watch/WRI does not endorse this project.

Sustainable Development Goals

Based on the Sustainable Development Report dataset.

Overall SDG score

Rank — Trend —

Climate action (Goal 13)

Rating — Trend —

All goals: score map

Data credits

Dataset: Sustainable Development Report 2025 by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).

Authors: Jeffrey Sachs · Guillaume Lafortune · Grayson Fuller · Guilherme Iablonovski

Official source: View dataset

Data sources include publicly available datasets released under open-use licenses. Where required, data providers have been notified in accordance with licensing terms.

Visualisation & interpretation: Диши.мк (independent, no endorsement implied)

How to read this data (without a PhD)

You are looking at Macedonia’s environmental “health check.” This page tracks two massive systems that shape your daily life.

  • Emissions: How much pollution we pump into the atmosphere.
  • SDG Scores: How close we are to 2030 global targets.

The Golden Rule

Do not read these numbers as abstract statistics. Read them as bills, heatwaves, and air quality.

  • High emissions = More extreme summers.
  • Stagnant scores = Higher energy costs and stalled infrastructure.
  • “Green” trends = Policies that are actually working.

The Emissions Reality: A Slow Decline

The headline number is 11.79 MtCO₂e. That stands for million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. It’s how we measure the total warming power of the country.

The Trend

  • 1990: 13.43 MtCO₂e
  • Peak: 14.30 MtCO₂e (1996)
  • Today: 11.79 MtCO₂e

The Takeaway: Macedonia has reduced emissions by about 12% since 1990. That sounds positive, but it is slow motion progress. We peaked in the mid-90s and have been drifting downward ever since. We aren’t plummeting; we’re gliding. To stop climate change, we need to plummet.


The “Why”: It’s the Energy

Why is the chart dominated by CO₂? Because energy is the main character in this story.

Sector Breakdown (2022)

  • Energy: 8.01 Mt (the massive majority)
  • Everything else: < 4 Mt (combined)

What this means for you: You cannot solve this problem by just recycling plastic or planting a few trees. About 68% of the country’s climate pollution comes from how we make power and heat our homes.

  • CO₂ (7.63 Mt): Comes from burning coal and oil.
  • Methane (2.53 Mt): Often leaks from waste and agriculture.

The hard truth: Unless we overhaul the energy grid, the total number will barely move.


The SDG Dashboard: Read with Skepticism

Your dashboard shows high scores. Do not just celebrate them. Interrogate them.

SDG 11: Sustainable Cities

  • Score: 93.6 (Very High)
  • Trend:On track

Reality check: You might look at a 93.6 score and ask: “Have they seen the air in Skopje during winter?”

This score can be deceptive. It measures things like lack of slums and access to basic water. It often fails to capture severe air pollution, traffic chaos, or urban heat islands.

Verdict: The infrastructure is there (high score), but quality of life is choking (low reality).

SDG 13: Climate Action

  • Score: 87.6
  • Trend:Stagnating

Reality check: A high score with a flat trend is a warning sign.

It usually means the easy gains happened years ago. Now we are stuck.

Verdict: We are coasting on past successes. Without new, aggressive policy, this line stays flat while summers get hotter.

The Takeaway

Macedonia is in a state of “Passive Progress.”

  • Emissions are falling, but mostly due to slow structural shifts, not aggressive action.
  • SDG scores look pretty, but can mask deep issues with air quality and energy stagnation.

What needs to happen? We need to attack the 8.01 Mt monster in the room: Energy. Until the power grid gets cleaner, the sustainability score is just a number on a screen, not a reality in your lungs.


Deep Dive: Two Hidden Stories in the Data

1) The Post-COVID Rebound

Looking closely at 2019–2022:

  • 2019: 12.24 Mt
  • 2020: 11.10 Mt (pandemic drop)
  • 2021: 11.05 Mt (still low)
  • 2022: 11.79 Mt (rising again)

The insight: We didn’t “fix” anything in 2020. We turned the economy off. Once life restarted, emissions bounced back. That’s a sign structural change hasn’t happened yet.

2) The Spillover Score

  • Spillover score: 85.0 (High)

What this means: Macedonia does not hide its pollution in other countries. Some richer states keep their air clean by moving dirty industries and waste abroad. On paper they look “green”, but the pollution still exists, just somewhere else.

The context: Macedonia doesn’t benefit much from this system. We are more often on the receiving end of it, through waste imports and low-quality goods — rather than exporting our pollution away.

The implication: Our environmental problems are shaped by both local pollution and unfair global trade practices.

Ending on a constructive note (✿◠ᴗ◠)

None of this means we are powerless. Progress is not automatic. It is built through consistent action.

  • Support local environmental groups and community initiatives.
  • Ask for cleaner energy, safer heating, and better public transport in your municipality.
  • Request transparency from institutions and follow up when answers are missing.
  • Reduce waste where you can, not perfectly, just consistently.
  • Share reliable information and correct misinformation when it spreads.

Activism does not have to be loud to be effective. Showing up matters. ♡

© 2025 Диши.мк — Powered by youth and open data.

Youth-led air quality project based in Skopje · Contact: hellodishi.mk@gmail.com